If one commits a traffic offense and get a ticket one may wonder whether they need to hire an attorney. It would be easier to pay a fine and move on. However, when one does this, it means that they are admitting and guilty of the offense. Likewise, the traffic ticket is placed in the person’s driving record, and it may remain there for a couple of years depending on what the offense was. This is why it is essential for one to hire an attorney to represent them. It is also good for one to do their search early instead of waiting until an offense is done then begin the search. Below is a guide on how to choose a traffic attorney.
Choosing A Traffic Attorney
When beginning the search of choosing a traffic attorney, start by first talking to people. This could be friends, family, and coworkers. They will be able to give information of a lawyer they may have hired or know someone who did. This information is considered reliable for there has been service that has been delivered before.
One can also do an online search and look for traffic attorneys within their area. This will produce a number of lawyers whom you can contact to hire.
Research the attorney’s credentials
Doing a background check on the attorneys is essential. This will help you know whether they are qualified to handle traffic cases. Find out if they have received the training and have been licensed to represent clients. This information will give you the confidence that can handle your case.
Know their experience
Look into how long the attorney has been practicing traffic law. Experience is important when looking a lawyer to represent you.
The number of cases they have handled similar to yours, and the success rate will be an indicator of the outcome of your case and what to expect. Also, find out how they will be handling your case.
Inquire on costs
Find out about the fee of the attorney. The rates will vary from one lawyer to another. Most charge a consulitation fee, then they will either charge a flat fee or an hourly rate. It is important to be aware of the costs and decide on what works best for you.
Finally, look for attorneys who will be available to take up you case when you need them. Look for signs of a lawyer who is constantly busy, they may not be available when you need them. Also, consider your personal preference, look for a lawyer whom you have chemistry with and listens to you.
In recent times there has been a significant upsurge in the number of people bringing forth professional negligence claims. This has been occasioned by the rise of the number of individuals that solely rely on the advice and skills of a professional. In a nutshell. Professional negligence is the breach of an ethical duty of care that exists between a professional and his client. In such a claim the client seeks compensation from the defendant to cover the damages and losses suffered as a result of those negligent actions. Accountants, Lawyers, Surveyors, Architects, and Doctors are some of the common professions that are subject to professional negligence suits. These claims are further based on the presumption that any individual who professes expertise in a particular profession is adequately trained and qualified to discharge the relevant functions thereto. Failure to discharge such functions judiciously is prima facie evidence of the breach of the duty of care.
However, it is important to differentiate a claim for negligence and poor services by a professional. Bad advice and poor service delivery do not necessarily meet the requirements/threshold required to prove a claim of professional negligence. In this regard, the threshold set for ascertaining such a claim is somewhat difficult to attain and therefore you need an experienced attorney to guarantee adequate compensation.
Duty of care
What gives rise to a duty of care? The contractual relationship between a professional and his client gives rise to a duty of care. A professional has an ethical and fiduciary obligation to be mindful and diligent in the performance of his responsibilities to the client. However, the relationship need not be contractual because it can arise in any line of business. In such a case the test of a reasonable man is applied to determine actions that amount to neglect.
Breach of duty
After establishing the existence of a duty of care it is thereafter required to show that the professional acted unreasonably towards his client. Hereby, the plaintiff is required to substantiate the actual breach based on the actions of the defendant. For example, breach of duty occurs when a doctor prescribes wrong medication to a patient who is later hospitalized.
These elements stipulate that one must show the injuries resulting from the unreasonable actions of the defendant. Further, a party must show that he suffered a pecuniary loss as a result of the injuries caused. Ascertainment of this element requires the provision of documents like receipts as evidence.